long sleeve polo shirts for girls March more inclusive this year
Protestors chat anti Trump slogans during the Women March on Washington in Washington, DC on Jan. 21, 2017, one day after the inauguration of President elect Donald J. Trump. landscape of women’s history: People across the nation will mark the anniversary of the historic Women’s March on Washington. But for some women, the anniversary is another reminder of the shortcomings of the 2017 Women’s March.
Critics said the march centered on cis white women at the expense of women of color and trans women, both groups who many felt had more to lose under a new administration many saw as hostile to human rights. At the start, organizers of the women’s march were almost all white, though they quickly course corrected by bringing on Tamika Mallory, Carmen Perez and Linda Sarsour.
But some underrepresented women felt their issues such as racism, discrimination, police brutality, LGBTQ inclusivity, and immigration were relegated in favor of issues that matter most to straight, white, middle class women. “Gender justice is related to economic justice and racial justice and we have to think about all these things. the 2018 Women’s March and sister marches converge on Saturday and Sunday across the country, many women are asking: Has anything changed?
Protesters rally at Women March on Washington
Tamika Mallory, co chair of last year’s historic protest and co president of the Women’s March board, said something had to change.
“We’re looking at all the communities that we seek to engage and work with, and we’re trying to figure out how to deepen those relationships and ensure all the stakeholders are at the table,” she said.
More: Power to the Polls: When and where is the women’s march in 2018?
Related: Why this women’s march photo is such a big deal
More: The Women’s March is back. Here’s what co president Tamika Mallory says is different.
Mallory said transgender inclusion is a priority, as is increasing visibility for women of color.
“I think also something that we learned last year is that the women’s march is sort of a microcosm of what is happening in the world,” she said. “We’re looking through our organization and figuring out where diversity is a problem even within the network, where we have chapters that are mainly led by white women and there needs to be an intentional effort to bring women of color into those particular networks.”
Women of color have a complicated history with feminism Feminism’s long history of perceived racism, combined with what some women saw as a lack of intersectionality at last year’s march, resulted in many black women and women of color refusing to attend.
Intersectionality, coined by law professor Kimberl Crenshaw in 1989, is the recognition of how different backgrounds and the racism,
sexism and classism that come with those identities overlap and impact the ways people experience oppression and discrimination. “They’re always talking about the community at large.”
What is intersectional feminism?: A look at the term you may be hearing a lot
Still reeling from Hillary Clinton’s loss to President Trump in the 2016 presidential election, some black women felt betrayed that 53% of white women voted for Trump, while 94% of black women voted for Clinton, according to exit poll data from The New York Times.
never felt anything remotely resembling sisterhood with white women. Friendship, affinity, fondness, love sure. Sisterhood? Nah. That sense of loyalty, interconnectedness, accountability and shared struggle simply isn there, wrote cultural critic Jamilah Lemieux, on why she was skipping the 2017 march, for Colorlines.
This year’s march has mostly side stepped the backlash of not having a diverse representation among leaders and speakers.
The PowerToThePolls campaign focuses on getting women registered to vote and electing progressive women into office. The Jan. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D Texas, among many other diverse speakers.
Hopkins, the Lakota indian activist, said she thinks there is “an effort this year to listen more, to include more people of color.”
She points to a local women’s march this weekend in Seattle that was organized to bring the issue of missing and murdered indigenous women to the forefront. Hopkins says that is a victory, although some women may not find it does enough.
LGBTQ+ women and organizations want better representation in the Women’s MarchThe now iconic pink “pussyhat” supporters wore during the march may be less visible this year. The hat, some believed, was offensive because transgender women and non binary people don’t necessarily have female genitalia.
“I personally won wear one because if it hurts even a few people’s feelings, then I don’t feel like it unifying,” said Phoebe Hopps, founder and president of Women’s March Michigan and organizer of anniversary marches Jan. 21 in Lansing and Marquette, told the Detroit Free Press.
More: Pink pussyhats: Why some activists are ditching them
The lack of representation of the trans community is not lost on the Women’s march leadership team. They say they will work harder to build a better connection to the trans community.
“Last year we learned and throughout the year we learned that there needs to be a greater focus on our relationship with the trans community,” Mallory, the Women’s March board co president, said. “And this year we are being very intentional about engaging the trans community and figuring out better ways to be a stronger partner.