veuve polo classic 2012 Chelsea should try and buy Marcus Rashford

camouflage polo shirt Chelsea should try and buy Marcus Rashford

Chelsea should make a move for Rashford

With Sanchez to Man United pretty much nailed on and your recent article on how he might fall down the pecking order behind Sanchez and Lukaku in his favoured position, I think it now fair to guess that the soul is pretty much being ripped out of Manchester United.

United have decided to splash out on a world class forward who is proven in the Premier League (60 goals and 25 assists in 122 appearances) and, as a supporter, the excitement is palpable because the guy is a match winner who will make a difference in tight matches and hopefully help get us closer to where we want to be. And by splash out I mean have essentially paid 0 in transfer fees yet will pay a premium in terms of wages and signing on fee. Even if the figures being bandied about are true (400k a week), over four years this is around 83m Liverpool just paid slightly less than that for a CB who is nearly 27 and only has a handful of caps for the poorest Dutch side in generations. Needs must.

Yet instead of being allowed to enjoy the possibilities of a wonder signing, we are disparaged because apparently it is all about the money. You see this one is different from all other transfers ever completed, given that every other player selected their club based on history, the fans, the manager, the possibility of winning something, the halftime pies etc. but never (ever!) was a decision based on money. If they could, these bastions of charity would have played for free but, you know, the kids need shoes so they kindly settle for meagre paycheques with only five zeroes on the end of it per week. But that greedy sod Alxi$ $anchz wanted a bit more than poor (and always frugal) Man City could afford so he chose Man Utd. I can hear you say, Man who? I’m reliably informed by Wiki that they are the biggest and most successful club in England, who have one of the most successful managers at the helm and play in front of 76,000 fans every other week why would anyone of sound mind go there except for money?

Put simply, if the world’s most valuable football club wants to spunk some of its wads of cash to pay a premium for a player it badly needs then what is the issue? City moved the goalposts when they started throwing their oil money around (who could forget the smug ‘Welcome to Manchester’ Tevez poster?) and now that a bigger club has the temerity to compete financially they are taking their ball and going home. My advice is to use those 50 notes you didn’t give Sanchez to dry your eyes. And for supporters of other clubs who are sniping, you wouldn’t be complaining if he was joining your club so let us have this one please.

the moved for money mantra is what the ABUs need to help them sob themselves to sleep at night, than I’m happy to accept it.

But then again maybe Sanchez isn’t a typical City mercenary, happy to jump into their squad half way through a season and gain a half earned league winners medal while being rotated with Sane and Sterling. Maybe he wants to play every week and earn some success of his own the hard way?

Whatever the motivation, we are getting a player worth at least 50m for nothing more than a player we’re not using and a large weekly wage. Seems like a bargain to me.

After all, how United spend their money is their business. (How City spend theirs is the Sheik’s business).

the idiot who says City and Bayern didn’t agree to Sanchez high wage demands and only united would, you are right but another take on it (yes a defending biased one, but a few valid points). Well the only reason they didn’t agree to his high wage demands is because he’s not as desperately needed as those other two clubs as he is at United. You would only see that being paid if he would be the Man Didn’t City just spend over 150m on three fullbacks two if which the bulk of 150M would be starters no? Didn’t they pay Raheem Sterling handsomely (and rightfully so) you could also add quite a few names to the Man City squad alone but that’s none of my business.

Hear me out at Bayern or any top level team he would be a squad player (albeit a very good squad player) but pay would only be reflected for a guy that’s going to start/shine. Correct me if I’m wrong Bayern have also just signed Goretzka. Yes different player (and Window) but you haven’t signed him to leave him on the bench also in the Bayern squad younger talent who you need to give time to like Coman, Muller not young but I don’t think the fans would be happy with that, the man also has a habit of scoring important goals, also a certain pretty good no.9 at the club in Mr Lewandowski. James Rodriguez too (again Sanchez may or may not be an upgrade but you didn’t sign the player to let the guy rot even Madrid tried with him for two years before moving on). Arjen Robben/Franck Ribery still at the club. Not at the level they were a few seasons ago but they are loved and still have something to offer. A very large talented squad already without Alexis.

At Man City I think the same applies. He is a better player than Sane and Sterling but again they are having fantastic seasons and would be very harsh to be dropped currently (yes Sanchez is better but it’s not like replacing sterling/sane with Messi). Then Jesus and Aguero I don’t feel he’ll be taking their roles. Silva and De Bruyne are pretty safe. To me that seems like the attacking roles all filled. At the end of it all you can only have 11 on a pitch at the same time and 20 odd players In the squad. Even if he is world class if he’s going to be part of a large squad and be rotated I don’t think you could logically agree to giving the high pay packet. At that point the ball is in your court to say well come play for us or we aren’t paying because Man City haven’t been missing a Sanchez.

At United he will start, he will be heavily relied upon, will be an upgrade (okay he’d be an upgrade in any squad but at united for Mata or Lingard, that could be quite big difference). Which is where the large sums for me makes sense as to why we paid and the other clubs didn’t because at Manchester United he automatically becomes an essential. We’ve been crying out for a squad overhaul and it is slowly taking shape. This is one of the moves.

FYI I didn’t know wages were included In the transfer. As for China money please leave it out. What’s wrong with earning China Money in the Prem/Europe whilst not really sacrificing having to drop a few levels.

the context of today’s transfer market (rightly or wrongly) being what is, if Alexis had a number of years remaining on his contract, I don’t think it would be incredibly outlandish for Arsenal to demand a fee particularly from a domestic rival of, say, 90m and for the player himself to command a salary of around 250,000pw

With Sanchez’ contract at Arsenal being what it is though, United are only (albeit in the shape of Mkhitaryan) approx. 30m up front and then him to the tune of a further 200/250,000pw. Depending on whose figures you believe,
veuve polo classic 2012 Chelsea should try and buy Marcus Rashford
even at the upper end, that payment will add up to just shy of 60m (250k extra x 234 weeks = 58.5m).

So, 30m/Mkhitaryan up front + 58.5m = a fee 88.5m, with the added benefits of amortising nearly two thirds it over a few years and not swelling the coffers of a 6 rival (debateable, granted) by a penny into the bargain.

Despite the collective pant wetting over the apparently wage packet, it’s really not, is it? It’s United paying the going rate (or at least somewhere in its ball park) for a player of considerable proven quality in the Premier League, just structured in a fashion appropriate to the slightly unusual circumstances.

seen a bunch of people bicker about the merits of the Sanchez/Mkhitaryan transfer, especially when it comes to the figures involved, considering United’s vast financial outlay. I’m not going to get into the numbers, because we don’t even know if what has been reported is correct, but considering United are not paying any transfer fees, and getting Mkhitaryan off their payroll, I think they probably don’t see an issue in paying Sanchez extra. As to whether this will impact the wages of the rest of the top players in the squad, if we’re sitting here considering it, it’s a fair bet Woodward and Co. have thought of the future too.

I do think Mkhi will do well at Arsenal though, especially if he links up with Aubemeyang. It’s a little sad to see him go, because like Mata he seems a lovely bloke, and is capable of some magic moments (the solo goal in Europe last season my pick of the bunch), but the fact of the matter is that he has severely underperformed. It seems strange to label Sanchez a panic buy, because I don’t think you need to panic when you swap a player that can’t get into your team for a genuine proven world class talent in Sanchez.

This is not even taking into consideration that Sanchez seems a lot more like a Mourinho player. He’ll chase every ball, work hard, and stand up and take charge in big games. Initially I wondered about the merits of buying him, and whether it will hinder the development of Martial, Rashford, and Lingard, but the simple fact of the matter is that you don’t pass up a chance to improve your squad when your rivals are running away from you. This way Rashford can develop at his own leisurely pace, and Jose’s counter attack has a genuinely terrifying outlet.

If you remember, it took Jose a couple of seasons to work out how to beat Pep’s Barcelona team (in my opinion the greatest club side of all time), but when he did he figured he could bypass the famous Barca press by hitting diagonals to Ronaldo, whose pace and finishing would hurt a defence that wasn’t used to being tested. Until now, United didn’t have anybody that could play that role (to a high standard anyway) Sanchez can. It also takes the heat of Pogba, as he doesn’t need to be the sole creative outlet anymore. If you’ve watched recent United games, you can see that we don’t create enough clear cut chances when Pogba isn’t involved, because the decision making in the attacking third is always so poor. We’re winning because our shooting (Martial) has been so good, but you can’t rely on that all the time.

So when people keep talking of value, we may not see the full benefits this season, but football’s not going to cease to exist after this season ends. United will be much better in the Champions League, and that much stronger come August.
veuve polo classic 2012 Chelsea should try and buy Marcus Rashford